Category Archives: Marketing History
Quick Tip: Two Fundamental Principles of Research Stimuli.
Lately, I’ve been doing a lot of research that involves new product concepts, web pages, packaging mockups and other types of stimuli. As a researcher, I’ve always been willing to provide feedback to clients on the stimuli they create, and they’re generally receptive to my suggestions. With that in mind, here are two immutable market research principles that we should all keep in mind when creating research stimuli.
1 – Research participants can only respond to something that’s in front of them. It’s difficult for most people to form an opinion on something entirely hypothetical. If you need to understand what flavors consumers might be interested in for your sports drink, don’t expect them to tell you; they’re going to need a list. If you want to know what menu options users would like on your web page, your mockup needs an example for them to react to. And if you want to know how much they might be willing to pay for that sports drink, your concept will need to include some pricing information—there’s no sense in asking ‘how much would you pay?’ In other words, people can’t generally tell you what they want—you need to show them something you think they might want and see if they agree.
2 – Research participants cannot help but respond to everything that’s in front of them. Reactions to a stimulus will be shaped by the entirety of that stimulus. And there isn’t any way to tease apart the elements that drove that reaction—you can’t unscramble an egg. So, if you don’t want to talk about price, don’t include one in your concept. If you’re not interested in discussing a new brand logo, don’t include it on your web page wireframe. In other words, stimuli must focus tightly on research objectives, and not include any extraneous information. The more your stimulus contains, the more likely it is that respondents will be distracted by issues that aren’t relevant. Also, don’t include more information in your stimulus than could realistically be found in real-world marketing executions. If there’s only room for one claim on your package, don’t put five in your concept.
Remember – a stimulus is just another way to ask a question. As with every question asked in qualitative research, it should be focused on your research objectives and must contain the right amount of detail.
Breaking That Awkward Silence.
We’ve all been in that uncomfortable situation that comes up periodically during qualitative research – DEAD SILENCE.
The conversation just stalls, and you have no idea what to ask next. So, what to do? Here are a few solutions that will help to break the ice and get things jump-started.
First, Don’t Panic. This is an opportunity to reset the conversation and steer things in a new, perhaps unexpected, direction. If you don’t want to do that, go to the next topic. Unless you’ve covered every topic in your guide – including those ‘time-permitting ones’ – there should be more to discuss. So just move on.
Don’t Fear the Pause. This is hard, but silence can often be beneficial. Participants may feel a need to say something, and that could lead to an unexpected insight.
Take The Pause Head-On. Say something like … “uh-oh – why has the room just gone quiet?”
Make The Topic of Conversation the Conversation Itself. It’s okay to encourage a bit of introspection to get things rolling again. You can ask:
“How is this conversation making you feel?”
“Has anything said in this conversation surprised you?”
“Have your thoughts and feelings about this topic changed in the course of this conversation?”
“Is there something we’re not talking about here that we should?”
“Is there something unsaid lurking beneath the surface of this conversation?”
Have A Few ‘Back Pocket’ Questions. Be prepared for that sudden lull. It’s a good idea to have some ‘questions for all occasions’ to ask if you’re stuck. I recently heard Stephen Colbert call this the – ‘In case of emergency, break glass, remove question’ question. Here are mine:
“What do I not seem to understand about this topic?”
“What don’t people understand about this topic?”
“Who do you think this product/brand/category is for?”
“You used the term ______ a minute ago. What did you mean by that?”
So, don’t fear awkward silence. It happens naturally during many conversations. Use it to your advantage and possibly to gain insights you never anticipated. Awkward silence can be your friend – if you’ll let it.
My thanks to master moderators Michelle Ogren Jeffrys and Pam Goldfarb Liss for their input on this topic.
Cross the River by Feeling the Stones.
Trial and error are often the path to success.
Sometimes you just have to try something and learn as you go. A few years ago, I conducted research on concepts for a new healthcare-related service. Most of these ideas were quite well developed. However, while we were designing the research, the client mentioned one idea they had that was so ‘out there’ that they didn’t quite know how to describe it. In fact, they even struggled when discussing it amongst themselves. That being the case, the client felt we should hold off on testing this idea.
I pushed back a little, pointing out that squeezing in one more concept would not be a big deal. I said, “look— just write something up. It doesn’t matter how bad it is. We’ll show it in the first group, see what people say, adjust accordingly, and then show it again to the next group. By the time we get to the end of the research, maybe we’ll have something.”
The reaction to the concept in the first group was primarily confusion. But, after some discussion, the participants began to understand the idea and made suggestions as to how to better describe it. We took this feedback, edited the concept, and showed a revised one in the second group where it did a little better.
As the research went on, we continued to adjust. By the final group the participants understood the idea fairly well, but still didn’t quite know what they thought about it. Afterwards, the client felt they had a much better understanding of what their idea was, and what they needed to do internally to continue to develop it. About a year later we showed fully developed descriptions which performed very well among individuals in certain consumer segments.
Just taking your best shot and adjusting along the way can be nerve-wracking, but it’s also effective— iteration is often our greatest teacher. We live in a staggeringly intricate world, and many systems and situations are so complex that they simply can’t be intuitively understood. It’s naïve to think you can design a perfect approach up front. Don’t’ fall into the trap of thinking that knowledge and experience alone will lead you to an optimal solution. This principle applies to all aspects of our lives, and certainly to marketing and market research.
Here are some examples of how a trial-and-error approach can be used in marketing and market research:
-
Some of my clients routinely optimize marketing tactics like service bundles, promotions and banner ads by introducing something in a limited geography or for a very short period. They see how it perform, tinker with it a bit, and then broadly introduce the optimized tactic.
-
When I write a discussion guide, I make a point of including multiple possible ways to ask questions, and several back-pocket exercises to be used if the primary exercises don’t work as hoped. It’s not realistic to think that everything I put into the guide is going to elicit the desired information, and it’s important to be ready to turn on a dime.
-
When screening research participants, give yourself plenty of time for recruiting. It’s likely you’ll learn some things during the first few days of screening that will make you realize you need to make some changes to either the research specifications or the questionnaire.
-
When designing research, consider breaking it into multiple phases. Depending on your objectives it might be valuable to have time to step back, think, adjust and do some more research. A phased approach can allow that.